I don't think Chipper is bright enough to realize that is your signature and not part of the post.

I also don't think he's bright enough to put together coherent thoughts. It seems to me that he's very wired on caffeine or speed when making his posts.

Chipper, you mention in your last post that someone can't respond without name calling, etc. Take a look at your original post.

FYI, Obama did nothing to kill Bin Laden except to give a go ahead. The intelligence community and Seal Team 6 got Bin Laden and it was all from intelligence spanning from the first Bush all the way through Clinton, Bush 2, and Obama.

As for your comments on how much Bush spent on the war, it is nothing compared to how much the deficit has gone up in the last 3.5 years. Look it up. Google "national deficit over the last 10 years" or something. There, I even gave you what to look for, now you have no excuse for ignorance.

Obama promised to have our troops out within a year. They're still there. Guess there was still a need to be there, eh?

Obama's policy as commander in chief is to simply destroy all targets with drones. No questioning to gather intel, no trial, no jury, just death because Obama says so.

I didn't like Bush either, so don't even go there. My favorite president as far as policy was probably Clinton, and there were some things he did that I didn't agree with either.

Thanx Neo ! You seen my point!

Oh one more thing Neo, Sorry you had to read that other part of my post to you. Of course you know that wasn't directed at you, and I'm sure you know that.

goodnite all

. . . but you digress . . . I'd do what Bush did - - - party down!

I did not digress, I ended the debate in a post to Neo-BT Reg was to ignorant to even bother with anymore, his posts proved it in almost every sentence.

ChipperB, there are a lot of BT Regulars on here! Is that another of the facts that you've missed?

Lions attack their prey in a unit. Does it matter which member of the pack that their prey fights back?