More Photo Evidence In BigFoot Sighting, Commenter Says No Uprooted Tree. Found Tracks
A commenter named “willhir20″ says “it wasn’t an uprooted tree”. In the comment section “willhir20″ has claimed to have visited the same site where the original sighting occurred and taken a series of photos. After walking to the spot, willhir20 claims there was no uprooted tree but did see what might be BigFoot tracks and took photos of them.
Here is his main comment from the article:
I have read most of the comments and I can tell you its not an uprooted tree unless aileans majicaly made it disaper. There were no stumpes on the ground and if there was the tree that it was in friont of was on a slite hill and there was about a foot and a half hole all the way around the tree. You can see nothing on the ground where it was at but furns and grass. What ever it was it was not an uprooted tree because it would still be there. Its 4.2 miles from t stop sign at park north to Bradford. there is a black colvert pipe there and a smale creek you can not see in pic.
And the photos he posted there: